My inbox has become a GPT-5 support group.
Ever since I published my August reviews, I've gotten hundreds of messages that sound like this: "Nate, I've tried everything. I read the OpenAI cookbook. I tried to apply the instructions. I’m prompting as best I can, but GPT-5 still feels like wrestling a brilliant PhD student who's determined to misunderstand me. What am I doing wrong?"
You're not doing anything wrong. GPT-5 is a speedboat with a temperamental rudder, and no one has invented power steering yet. This model is just fundamentally different from what came before.
It’s worth remembering: GPT-5 isn't one model making decisions.
It's a routing system managing multiple specialized models, and every word you write—hell, even formatting—can trigger different computational pathways. The brilliant analysis you got this morning? You accidentally triggered the deep reasoning route. The generic bullets you got this afternoon? You hit the efficiency optimization path. You get the idea.
And no, it’s not as simple as hitting the model picker in the dropdown! ChatGPT-5 will still think longer or less long about the problem you give it depending on your prompt—even if you pick the exact same model.
It all feels like a recipe for pain and frustration, and to be honest I think OpenAI hasn’t done enough to help users learn to prompt this model.
I've spent the last month figuring this out. Not through documentation (OpenAI’s prompting guide is just a starter), but through thousands of tests, comparing notes with other power users, and reverse-engineering prompts to figure out the mechanisms behind model performance.
The solution isn't more mind-numbing detail and work on your part. The solution is the right structure. And I'm going to show you exactly how to build it.
Beginner Corner: At the beginning of this guide, I'll give you the five-minute fix—a universal meta-prompt that translates your tired Friday afternoon "analyze this" into the structured format GPT-5's architecture actually needs. It's copy-paste simple, and it works immediately. I want to make this as easy as I can for you.
Then we'll go deeper. I've built nine battle-tested templates for the work that actually matters—business strategy, technical development, research, creative projects—each one designed to trigger the right routing decisions consistently. These aren't theoretical. I use them daily. My clients use them. They work.
Finally, I'll explain why this is happening. The principles of model behavior I’ve derived through testing. Why this model is especially sensitive to contradictions. How to test if your prompts are working. When meta-prompting helps and when it's overkill.
Because here's the thing: the companies getting value from GPT-5 aren't the ones with better ideas. They're the ones who understand that this isn't a conversational AI anymore. It's an agentic system that needs programming, not chatting. And once you know how to program it, the chaos becomes control.
The model that everyone's calling "inconsistent" and "frustrating" becomes remarkably powerful when you speak its language. I'm going to teach you that language.
PS. Looking to read more of my coverage of ChatGPT-5? You can find one handy list just for ChatGPT-5 news here.
Listen to this episode with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Nate’s Substack to listen to this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.
